2011-03-13, 04:53 PM
Stereo Wrote:It's transparently obvious that you don't understand the contents of the emails you're quoting... "climategate" is a non-issue, there is no shocking reveal. UEA is not the only place that studies the atmosphere, and a list of scientists who think global warming is a non-issue is meaningless.
Are you saying that breaking the law (destroying the source data for the IPCC) scientific fraud and scientific opinions that dont agree with global warming is a non-issue?
Science is suppose to be an open field for peer review. Saying that opinions of other scientists is unimportant is to deny standard scientific processes.
And I do understand what these men are saying. They are discussing the fraud they are commiting. They clearly are talking about forging data. They are clearly discussing how they want to silence opposition. They even discuss how they are hiding important data from the scientific community (this is important because now that the source data is destroyed, the IPCC's and EUA's claims cannot be replicated).
How is this a non-issue?