[1.2.374] Monster Park?

What a rebuttal that was. Allow me to bow before your brilliance.
Sorry that I apparently kicked in one of your sandcastles while stomping around on Basil.
Seeing as I have no clue who you are, I can't really tell if an apology is in order.

It's your sandcastle I knocked over. Sorry that you couldn't get the attention you were craving for.

Whose speculation? Takebackers? Because it couldn't be.
A hypothesis is an explanation for a phenomena, not a prediction of one.

I'm sorry but are you really trying to seem so bullheaded you can't even see past your horns?

a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation (working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.
2.
a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument.
3.
the antecedent of a conditional proposition.
4.
a mere assumption or guess.

See the last bit? A hypothesis is by no means an answer. If you are able, once again, apply some common sense to the subject, his statement, which by all means I'd place money on, is that the new PQ will not be beneficial exp wise, based on past experiences, and the illogical conclusion that after releasing leons castle, a 140-16x+ zone, a 120 pq would by any means surpass that in exp wise.

All semantics aside, the developers have demonstrated no pattern in their release of new content other than frequency.

Okay I'll bite, how many PQ's are beneficial exp wise? Pirate pq and CPQ. How many pq's are there? Yeah.

I'm not looking for a fight; I just didn't appreciate him shooting down the idea with an absolute statement where there could be no absolute. However, I'm not sure that someone who stomps in with personal insults has any room to say who is looking for a fight.

You read too deep into his words and he simply was backing up his statement. And pretty hypocritical, I would quote every single derogative you've posted in the last 2 pages, but I don't think the webpage could handle it.

PS: To quote yourself - "It's ignorant to shut down any possibility when it clearly exists."

Since you like quoting me maybe you can quote where I'm ignorant of the possibility? I'm simply defending his statement as a clear logical one based on the circumstances. In other words, your nitpicking a very plausible statement and being an antagonistic asshat about it. Sorry though I could make it a lil clearer for you since you've never been one to catch on to what's between the lines.