[1.2.374] Monster Park?

Did i say they did? Did i say anything about neglect? I remember saying that there is a set MODEL, PLAN, etc 4th job has used and it has not changed to make PQs the primary source of experience.

No, what you said was what I quoted. However, you went into no explanation as to what exactly the "high level model" was, leading me only to make speculation and assumptions.

And, again, it has changed many times in the past.

Want me to reverse it and say "An event not occurring is not evidence that it will occur"? Refer to Appeal to probability. You're saying it CAN happen because it HASN'T happened? That's not a guarantee at all...

Please don't grasp for straws.
Yes, feel free to reverse it. That's perfectly fine, but it has nothing to do with my argument. I'm not saying it will happen; I'm saying it could happen. Or have you not been following along?

It's rather hilarious that you're citing "appeal to probability" when you're the one invoking it.
May wanna read that bit about "A second form of the appeal to probability is the appeal to improbability or an appeal to impossibility in which the odds of an occurrence are drastically downplayed in order to bolster an insecure position or brush aside something that is problematic. This form of the appeal often applies to circumstances where the actual odds are not known."

My argument has not once been that this is or that there will ever be a 120+ PQ that outpaces training.
I've simply been saying that it could be. Therefore, my stance has been "because something could happen, it could happen". Where's the logical fallacy there?

GMS has plenty of 120+ designed PQs, but you keep shifting the argument between GMS and KMS. Which version do you want to stick to? Because KMS doesn't have ludi maze PQ, and now neither do we.

I have not once specifically mentioned either version, so I couldn't have been shifting my argument.
I would, however, love to see a list of these multiple PQs designed for 120+. Only one that comes to mind is VPQ, but that was an event PQ that didn't even give experience for completion.

No, my argument is not anything to do with something existing or not. It is about what would result from it existing. Two different concepts. My point is that Nexon Korea would be stupid to replace LHC so quickly if this completely imaginary godly exp PQ is about to be released.

Not if it was simply an alternative, not a replacement.

ASJROAWNETAKLENTYAIERNATOJINASDR

Might i direct you the post that originally started any kind of 120+ CPQ discussion?

She questioned nothing more than what it was. You're the one who went and assumed that the experience would be terrible and all other sorts of things.

How about the post that even incited any kind of argument over an imaginary and completely irrelevant implication? You seriously might as well go into mapleadditions and start getting into fuming arguments with them over their ideas, because that's basically what you've been doing up till now...

I have no idea what mapleadditions is, but I'm not really interested in that.
It is funny that you think I've done anything in this thread that you have not. I just haven't said that I find it annoying.

I don't even believe speculation is even meant to be argued against because it's literally based on shaky evidence and pure ideals, not to mention i'm not a korean developer. >.>

And yet, you argued against that original post? Still not understanding it.

Also, growing tired of an argument does not make me a masochist for posting it. What kind of pain/pleasure am i getting out of this? Or should i call you a sadist and bring on even more ad hominyms? Good job egging on another response when i clearly stated i'm done with this though.

No, but starting and continuing a speculative argument when you believe "so speculating over it when stuff like this happens is just annoying."

I argued against your original post because there is a difference between speculation and fantasy. Namely, that speculation should be rooted in something.

I do agree that we've veered far from the original matter though, so we can end it here if you'd like.
Don't really intend to have an ongoing discussion about a completely theoretical matter in an extraction thread.
Not worth the energy.