2008-09-26, 02:36 AM
Leaves Wrote:Secondly, a sponsor's slate is indeed a confusing definition. However, we still know that there is a specific requirement for the end of the video, whether you understand "sponsor's slate" or not. We also know that sponsor's slate does not mean guild picture, for obvious reasons. To me, by using logic, I can deduce that sponsor's slate means nexon's logo. This is how it was done on the other video contest, and how I believe it was meant to be done this time. Understood?Gosh.. Ok I admit the rule about the sponsor slate is worded stupidly:
The Contest Submission must include the Sponsor Slate as the final content.
What they were referring to by 'final content' was the video, not the 'slate'. How do we know this? By reading the sentence after that:
It may be animation, live action or both but must be an audiovisual presentation in an electronic file format compatible with YouTube's and MySpaceTV's posting requirements and in compliance with YouTube's Terms of Use and MySpaceTV's Terms of Use.
It's not that they said 'You must end your entry with a picture of our logo.' I never stated that my 'sponsor slate' was the guild picture, I did it by simply stating Nexon's ownership of intellectual property.
Seeing as how the American branch of Nexon uses whatever material they want from other versions of MS, I don't see how using music from other versions of MS would be a problem. Eventually those tracks will be in gMS too.
Anyways, I'll drop the subject right here, since nothing will change no matter who is right.