2011-02-27, 07:30 PM
Bomber Wrote:You don't create an entire post against him and then wrong this. That's not how an arguement works. Whether or not you believe this or actually is this, you are restraining him. Reason being because you are not making him understand. Seeing his post above, he wanted to post back stating whatever. You are not giving him a chance to help you or himself understand unless he understood from you last post. Same thing goes for you since you never created a rightful end to this debate. Even if you declared your post done, the debate has, unfortunately, never ended because you chose to create that gray spot.
That's not what I said at all. I said I was done posting and wouldn't respond to him any further because he has a history of dragging out discussions/arguments for 7 pages and rarely if ever does he acknowledge anyone else as right. And whether or not I'm right or wrong, I'm not going to continue posting about it because there's no need for it. I've made the point I wanted to make; he can respond if he wants and I will read it but I'm not going to argue with him further.
The entire point of my posting in this thread was to state that you can't claim the method of choosing testers is faulty and I've effectively shown why I believe that. There's nothing else to be said on my end.