2011-02-27, 06:30 PM
Sarah Wrote:You have no one to be angry with but yourself for choosing not to log it. Granted, I know that's difficult for you in your current situation, but it's still not THEIR problem. That's why it's misdirected.
Log what? I'm more than entitled to be angry with nexon for choosing a method that does not benefit me, which would in turn benefit them.
I've already said that it doesn't matter because this happened FOUR MONTHS AGO. Please refrain from perpetuating an argument that you yourself spurred which has nothing to do with the topic of this thread.
Sarah Wrote:I have no idea what you're even saying here. I feel like you didn't even read my posts because neither of your responses have anything to do with what I've said.
Doesn't have much to do with your OVERALL point, but it's a focused response to one part of your response. Specifically towards the part that implied that they did NOTHING. Which they did not.
Sarah Wrote:The point is, you can't call their method of choosing participants flawed because
1. We don't know what all of the credentials are,
2. We don't have a record of what bugs are reported by the testers and
3. Nexon doesn't hold up their end and without them properly taking care of Tespia you can't place the blame on the testers or their method of choosing testers.
1) Because we don't know all of them effectively means we can assume there weren't any others. We know what they've told us, and that's all that matters to the argument that their credentials were lacking.
2) Why do we need it? We know there is one, and we know it was significant because otherwise Nexon would not continue to launch tespia again and again. If tespia was shut down so long ago due to a lack of bug records, then we can say tespia is continued because of the opposite.
3) Nexon holds up their end to the best of their ability and since we know tespia only proves to improve their ability to fix stuff...then Nexon is doing fine.
A producer for Nexon clearly placed the blame on the testers for why tespia was taken down. Obviously blaming the testers is something we can do, and because we can blame the testers we can blame the cause for testers sucking d'ick. The cause being the method for choosing testers. You cannot possibly deny that improved credentials means improved tester base, which improves the effectiveness of tespia overall.