I am sorry if you misinterpreted my sayings. I didn't talk (or intend to talk) in a rude voice, or intend to bring anyone down, whatsoever. I do feel that you intended to do so, though.
Retalion, I never did any such thing with your video, so please do not say I have. Infact, numerous times I've tried helping you with recieving your prize - so please. I got my 3rd place and did not complain - I was quite happy with it, and openly admit that your video was better. Not once did I ever complain of this, so making things up is useless. I think you must be confusing me with someone else.
Secondly, a sponsor's slate is indeed a confusing definition. However, we still know that there is a specific requirement for the end of the video, whether you understand "sponsor's slate" or not. We also know that sponsor's slate does not mean guild picture, for obvious reasons. To me, by using logic, I can deduce that sponsor's slate means nexon's logo. This is how it was done on the other video contest, and how I believe it was meant to be done this time. Understood?
The music a grey line - there isn't a yes, or a no. It is owned by Nexon Korea, NOT Nexon America Inc., who is identified as the sponsor on the official rules.
Thank you very much retalion for mentioning the section of the rules where Nexon may basically do anything they want -you're right. However, that is the same as the ToS, and, just because they say "we reserve the right to do whatever the hell we want", that does not mean they should, would, or can do it.
Lastly, I am not even the creator of any submissions in the contest - and I am by no means implying that my guild's entry was better OR worse than any other. I am SIMPLY saying that it is my full belief that rules were broken, on the winning entry.
Thanks, I'm trying to save this from becoming a flame war. As I said before, well done regardless.
EDIT: Yeah. Thanks retalion for communicating with me. Guess you mixed me up with someone else =p
Retalion, I never did any such thing with your video, so please do not say I have. Infact, numerous times I've tried helping you with recieving your prize - so please. I got my 3rd place and did not complain - I was quite happy with it, and openly admit that your video was better. Not once did I ever complain of this, so making things up is useless. I think you must be confusing me with someone else.
Secondly, a sponsor's slate is indeed a confusing definition. However, we still know that there is a specific requirement for the end of the video, whether you understand "sponsor's slate" or not. We also know that sponsor's slate does not mean guild picture, for obvious reasons. To me, by using logic, I can deduce that sponsor's slate means nexon's logo. This is how it was done on the other video contest, and how I believe it was meant to be done this time. Understood?
The music a grey line - there isn't a yes, or a no. It is owned by Nexon Korea, NOT Nexon America Inc., who is identified as the sponsor on the official rules.
Thank you very much retalion for mentioning the section of the rules where Nexon may basically do anything they want -you're right. However, that is the same as the ToS, and, just because they say "we reserve the right to do whatever the hell we want", that does not mean they should, would, or can do it.
Lastly, I am not even the creator of any submissions in the contest - and I am by no means implying that my guild's entry was better OR worse than any other. I am SIMPLY saying that it is my full belief that rules were broken, on the winning entry.
Thanks, I'm trying to save this from becoming a flame war. As I said before, well done regardless.
EDIT: Yeah. Thanks retalion for communicating with me. Guess you mixed me up with someone else =p