2008-09-24, 09:40 PM
Some people in this forum need to learn how to analyze an argument.
Butterfli's thesis can be summed up thusly: "Why do people continue to play even though it's a common fact that Nexon's quality is terrible, the game is horribly imbalanced, and when Nexon shows no loyalty to its customers?"
The "why do people continue to play" is the crux of this argument. The facts about Nexon and imbalances are just supporting reasons. A few people got hung up in the supporting reasons and answered the thesis wrong.
Nowhere is Butterfli saying, "I hate this game it sucks" or "I want to quit". Butterfli is asking for a reason why people play DESPITE all of the crap that Nexon gets away with. He's asking about the players, not the argument for why Nexon sucks. Telling him "if you don't like this game gtfo" only means that you didn't read the argument well.
Butterfli's thesis can be summed up thusly: "Why do people continue to play even though it's a common fact that Nexon's quality is terrible, the game is horribly imbalanced, and when Nexon shows no loyalty to its customers?"
The "why do people continue to play" is the crux of this argument. The facts about Nexon and imbalances are just supporting reasons. A few people got hung up in the supporting reasons and answered the thesis wrong.
Nowhere is Butterfli saying, "I hate this game it sucks" or "I want to quit". Butterfli is asking for a reason why people play DESPITE all of the crap that Nexon gets away with. He's asking about the players, not the argument for why Nexon sucks. Telling him "if you don't like this game gtfo" only means that you didn't read the argument well.