2008-07-08, 01:02 AM
Ah the ever-so-debated topic. Well then, just to add my two cents...:
Power wise and money wise, lukless > luk. The bad thing about lukless is that you're stuck with the same looking boring equips for a long time, you lose 10% when you die, and you dunno if you're gonna be able to pull through way later in the future.
Regardless, lukless right now are a lot more convinient to most people for oh-so-many reasons. Personally, I prefer normal luk because I can equip nearly anything I want to without a hassle. I have fun changing my crap from time to time.
In my opinion though, low luk could be the best. Having just enough luk to equip some higher level stuff that's decently scrolled and no lukless could ever touch? I think that sounds secksay.
Power wise and money wise, lukless > luk. The bad thing about lukless is that you're stuck with the same looking boring equips for a long time, you lose 10% when you die, and you dunno if you're gonna be able to pull through way later in the future.
Regardless, lukless right now are a lot more convinient to most people for oh-so-many reasons. Personally, I prefer normal luk because I can equip nearly anything I want to without a hassle. I have fun changing my crap from time to time.
In my opinion though, low luk could be the best. Having just enough luk to equip some higher level stuff that's decently scrolled and no lukless could ever touch? I think that sounds secksay.