2011-02-04, 10:09 PM
Anonymous Moose Wrote:Mercury and Aluminum. The question is regarding the neurotoxins within the vaccine itself.
http://www.ehow.com/about_5376461_foods-...rcury.html
and
http://home.earthlink.net/~joannefstruve/_wsn/page2.html
Haven't searched for specific numbers, but I'm quite certain we can agree theres a pineappleload more mercury/aluminum going into your body from fish and other foods you eat on a DAILY basis.
With respect to aluminum, since we, having backgrounds in science, know that every second, different reactions are occuring all the time with something even as simple as a drip of water falling on a page, whenever you wrap your food in aluminum foil, you are increasing it's aluminum content.
And how about fillings? You have any of them in your pearly whites? Got any Amalgam based fillings?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amalgam_(dentistry)
Guess we shouldn't get fillings either for fear the dentist might make us autistic.
Anonymous Moose Wrote:However, with mutations in retroviruses, this is a rather valid point regarding pointless vaccines like the flu vaccines out there.
Then regarding HPV, gardasil only supposedly works on, iirc, 6 strains out of a about a few dozen.
And no, you discredited nothing. Perhaps you should start by answering question one.
1. What to ask: Could you please provide one double-blind, placebo-controlled study that can prove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
Could you please provide one double-blind, placebo-controlled study that can disprove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
2. What to ask: Could you please provide scientific evidence on ANY study which can confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
Could you please provide scientific evidence on ANY study which can refute the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
See what happens when we ask a question, and expect to get a reply from someone without actually backing up our side of the argument.
That site is useless. It's full of "What if's", which scientifically speaking means jack pomegranate.
Anonymous Moose Wrote:Source? Studies? Placebo? Oh right, its more ethical to test vaccines on the public rather than in a lab.
I agree that we need to test all vaccines in a lab, which is why I haven't received the H1N1 shot. It was rushed to market, and I don't trust it.
Anonymous Moose Wrote:Also, earlier I showed the possibility of Gardasil causing more deaths than it "potentially" could prevent. Also, I'd rather get certain diseases like the chicken pox, rely on natural almost always life time immunity, etc rather than rely on vaccines that contain known toxic materials that require shot every few years because the immunities provided are inferior to a fully natural immune response.
Then of course many diseases that vaccines prevent like Hep B, cancer from HPV, and even the flu are easily avoided, easy to cure with regular pap smears, and a non-fatal disease, respectively.
I agree with the chicken pox part, but what about small pox or polio? Would you want your body to fight those on it's own?
Since you're so pro-natural selection, you may as well cancel your health insurance, and let life take its course. Since your entire debate around vaccinations relies on letting the human body fight it off itself, you'd be a complete hypocrite if you took any kind of medicine, proven or disproven.

