2011-02-04, 01:17 AM
Jamie_Kurosawa Wrote:Yes it better than nothing but it's not bulletproof in what can happen.
What Nexon could start with is using high encryption levels between the Server and Client using things on par with WPA2-AES's level of encryption or better to where a public/private key has to be downloaded to the client, verify the client is registered to the user such as taking a hash of the MAC address or some other random ID Code from a random piece of hardware and encrypting it using SHA-2. This way only authorized PCs can access the account.
Give them time Link... and they will... and who's to say they aren't working on something far worse?
Your other thread was closed for your reasoning, which Eos himself declared as nothing more than silly. Literally giving access to your authenticator does not mean that it's ineffective. Cracking it is an entirely different story.
NOTHING is bulletproof as long as people will do stupid things, but at least you can stop hackers from easily cracking your account with nothing more than a google search worth of tools.
Also, all I'm seeing in your post is technical mumbo jumbo to sound more convincing.

