Mandatory Vaccinations

I'm just a skeptic by nature. I question everything.

Which in my opinion is always a good thing.

Anyway, I'm going to not reply to a few posts. If you want me to answer some of your questions, then just read my old posts. Most of the questions you have asked me have already been answered and I have backed up with evidence. If you wish to ignore the studies that dont support your preconceived notations then I cant do anything about that.

Although people need to stop saying Wakefield is a fraud, because apparently it was lies about him and his studies that caused him to lose his license. One of the major lies used to discredit him is that no studies shared the same results or conclusions, and yet there are studies that concur with his studies http://www.ageofautism.com/2010/01/wakef...dings.html
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2011/0...wakefield/

Back to placebos, I've been having difficulty looking into studies. One major problem is that many studies will only give me brief summaries unless I pay for them, and I need the details. One in particular is what placebo is used. The standard for injections is saline solution. While my search was at first fruitless I did manage to come across one major concern I have with the credability of many studies:

The first key deception occurred during Gardasil trials. Instead of using a “saline solution” as the placebo, Merck used the vaccine's carrier agent minus only the HPV virus components. In addition to sodium chloride and water, the placebo also contained aluminum, polysorbate 80 and sodium borate.

http://www.tbyil.com/Gardasil_Deception.htm

In other words, they used the vaccine minus the antigens of the virus in order to pretend that the vaccine does not cause increased rates of paralization or death. This fraud sickens me, and the fact that these frauds are protected from prosecution by law. If it wasnt for laws granting immunity to these people, there would at least be a real incentive for proper studies and quality control.

Also, Scientists are being silenced:

Many who speak out against Merck products quickly find their credibility assaulted. If they are in an academic institution, they quickly find their research support drying up, and some end up blackballed by the pharmaceutical industry. What Merck has made perfectly clear over the last several years is that speaking out against Merck’s products is academic suicide.

http://coto2.wordpress.com/2009/09/28/me...bjections/

New research shows that information on potentially lethal side effects of the blockbuster painkiller Vioxx was "neglected, restricted, distorted and silenced" by pharmaceutical giant Merck, writes London-based physician and author John Briffa in The Epoch Times.

http://www.naturalnews.com/028730_side_e...drugs.html

Dr. David Graham, who reveals how his FDA managers tried to silence him and quash evidence that indicated Vioxx was unsafe.

http://current.com/green/88795960_pbs-dr...unsafe.htm
One thing in common here is the connection with Merck, one of the largest, if not largest, drug and vaccine companies in America.