Mandatory Vaccinations

And if a disease is in decline, which is the case for many diseases supposedly eradicated by vaccines, then that brings doubt to the official claim that vaccines killed the diseases.

And instead suggest that the diseases disappeared into thin air all by themselves?

From all I can see, you're simply repeating the few arguments that anti-vaccinationists employ without even stopping to ask yourself, wait, does this make sense. There is an equilibrium in everything around which all things fluctuate; just because something starts a trend within a very limited period of time does not mean it will continue that trend, in fact, it's only natural for half diseases to start declining right before a certain point and the other half doing the exact opposite. But somehow you never hear about the other side of the story.

You want proof that vaccines work? How about the process of vaccines coming into use in the very first place? Isn't it only common sense that something has to be functional for it to remain existent over long periods of time?

And by the way, that article:
1/ "Lends credence to Andrew Wakefield's famous studies in 1998."
2/ Does exactly just the shouting. They inject vaccines into primates, observe them developing abnormal behavioral changes, come up with a conclusion that the "bad" things in the vaccine are responsible. Wow. Even if their experiment were sound, it still wouldn't sound any less idiotic when put like that.
Premise 1: Vaccine A contains harmful substance X
Premise 2: Vaccine A proves harmful
Conclusion: Substance X is responsible for said harm

For real? Shouldn't they at the very least be attaching something like this but with opposite results? In fact, wasn't Mercury-based thimerosal preservative removed from all vaccines in 2001 (for whatever reason, even yours) and autism rate still went up regardless? What's more, CDC claims that thimerosal has never been used in MMR, and I don't think the government would be making such an easily disprovable claim, but I don't know about you.

However, aspertame is a poison.

It's much the same way fish is okay to eat, isn't it? At least, that's the government's take on legalizing it. They don't "just allow it", they allow it with a reason. They don't tell you it's okay, go ahead and eat it all you want, but rather that it's allowable in certain limited amounts and situations. Like you said, a man's meat is poison to another, know your own body and steer clear of food you can't eat. It's common sense, Mute can't eat shellfish and he knows it.