2011-02-02, 12:55 PM
Anonymous Moose Wrote:Is there any proof that non-vacinated people are a danger to vacinated people? Is there a real study out there that proves this so called fact? I'm personally annoyed that people would defend criminals that are responsible for at least reckless endangerment over unproven vaccines.
What exactly is there to prove? That a patient is a container of viruses? That transmission of said viruses does happen from person to person? That vaccinated people are still, at a low rate, subject to contracting illnesses when exposed to viruses (in this case, via non-vaccinated people)? Even if the vaccine has a 30% success rate, not taking it still means you are MORE likely to contract such disease, adding another threat the unprotected people (who are unlucky enough not to have the vaccine work for them).
Quote:Every year people have formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum, and several other substances that are detrimental to your health for a completely unproven vaccine.Does any of your "studies" specify how much these amounts would be within any or each vaccine dose? Which? At which period of time? How exactly dangerous they are? Or perhaps just mentioning the names of mercury, formaldehyde and aluminium would be enough to make a point?
Quote:Then of course, I've cited several viruses that have begun to decline before the introductions of vaccinesWhat does this even mean? That no vaccine is needed if the disease is already on the decline? And you were defending the minority unlucky people over there.

