Mandatory Vaccinations

People can consent to not take medical treatments. In fact several communities in this nation refuse to take vaccines every day including the Amish. This is not unethical.

Also, there is more than one side effect, and there has been no proof that the swine flu was an effectve vaccine (in fact it was rush onto the market).
http://www.naturalnews.com/026866_swine_...ccine.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/031075_vaccin...zures.html
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articl...lepsy.aspx
http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/flu-va...rom=age_ft

This is just a handful of side effects.

Personally, i think each individual should make their own choice regarding vaccinations and determine for themselves whether the risk is worth the vaccination rather than let a government agency that clearly caters to the drug companies decide for you.

Do you just ignore the posts that give decent arguments against yours, or are you just too stubborn of a conspiracy theorist to change your mind?

As Devil's Sunrise said, drug companies would make more money on people getting sick than preventing sickness, and I believe it. Let's just say we live in a hypothetical universe where vaccinations do work; one shot could prevent you from contracting a disease, which means the drug companies get to sell one shot. But if people just got the disease instead and had to be hospitalized, they would be given so many more drugs there.

And if you're so adamant about results being scientifically proven, then stop posting 1:x ratios of people with autism to people without autism in amish societies, because there is a bigger difference between Americans and the Amish than the vaccines they are given. And if you even look into the reference given for the 1:10,000 statistic, you'd see that not only do they say that the results are not substantial enough to prove vaccinations cause autism, but that there is also one neurologist studying these 10,000 people, half of whom HAVE BEEN VACCINATED IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER.

And let's take a look at a disease besides smallpox. How about Polio? The number of cases worldwide starting increasing around 1910, and thousands of people because paralyzed because of it. In the early 1950s tens of thousands of Americans were diagnosed with Polio. The Polio vaccine was released in 1955. In 1957, there was about 5,600 reported cases. In 1961, only 164 cases were reported.

Can you honestly say the standard of living between the 1950s and 1960s changed so greatly that it nearly entirely eradicated a disease?

A lot of your points go off the idea that there are no good people in power, and everybody involded in drugs and government are self-serving swine. How can you be sure not one of the people you referenced wasn't self serving?

Edit: And take a look at the chance of the H1N1 virus spreading from those with the nasal spray 1 out of 50 people? That's absurd. hundreds of kids in my school got the nasal spray last year. You know how many spread the swine flu after getting the vaccination? None.