2011-01-27, 08:21 PM
Sarah Wrote:Disagreeing with you / proving you wrong is trolling?
Anyone who thinks graphics are an important part of a gaming experience might as well just go watch Pixar movies because that's all your really getting from games with superb graphics. A whole lot of cinematic and very little gameplay.
Chris Wrote:Thanks for your biased opinion, please enjoy your day!
I don't mock people when arguing with them.
To be honest, with the current days, if a game doesn't live up to the console's specs it's pretty retarded. Imagine a 3D game in the PS3 with awful graphics. Would you buy it? A WHOLE DIFFERENT issue is when the game actually attempts to go over that barrier, namely Scott Pilgrim for the PS3 for example.
Baklava Wrote:I'm trying to be serious here, sir, stop being so blind!
Stop lying sir! And it already looks better, graphically, than a big chunk of PS2 games.
I don't doubt the PSP(name) has probably some pretty graphics but you can't say that pretty graphics, even if the games are terrible, are worth $300+
I put them in the same group, sorry for that, mind-slipped.
I don't lie, and I can argue that after going through the PSP's library looking for underrated gems, I've found a lot of games worth playing, it's not only graphics you get from the Sony handhelds.
Also, it doesn't look anywhere near PS2 graphics Chris, don't kid me.

