2011-01-19, 04:22 PM
Eosian Wrote:Rather what you meant isn't what you said because what you just restated contradicted the literal meaning of what you originally said.
What You Said First What You Say Now
What you just said "Without M you can still have string. Without string, there can be no M" contradicts String being a subset of M, and is exactly what I, and Wikipedia, just told you.
You're using component in the recipe sense, not the foundation/structural sense.
Hold on let me edit my posts to make you correct. Edits in bold.
Non-time-travel EDIT: Please note the bold in the previous post is not an edit and that post is unedited. Gosh it looks like i was literally saying the exact same thing before my time-travel escapades.

