Poll: Is it worth it?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, it's worth it.
22.22%
4 22.22%
No, it isn't
72.22%
13 72.22%
Either way is worth it
5.56%
1 5.56%
Total 18 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should a Warrior starts pumping DEX for the new equips?
#10
ghostofhalo Wrote:What now? Since when do you not need to have the DEX requirement to equip something? As far back as I can remember, you must have the requirement before equiping an item. Example: The level 140 gear requires 170 DEX. You must have 170 DEX before being able to equip it. Let's assume you have 160 DEX and earrings that add 10 DEX. You can equip a level 140 weapon assuming that your old one did not have any DEX on it that added to the 160 DEX. Additionally, if you're equiping the entire set and those earrings and then unequip the earrings, all equips turn red and are "unequiped" because you no longer meet the minimum. Unless this changed post-BB or post-Chaos, it's been this way since the dawn of Maple time. If you have 43 DEX and the equips give you a bonus 127 DEX to meet 170 DEX, you cannot wear the equips since you did not first meet the DEX requirement prior to equipping them.

It's more complex than this.
If you have 3 equips that add 3 dex for example and their requirement is say, 90 dex and you actually have 84 dex. Equipping a earring that gives you 10 dex, equipping those 3 equips and then taking off the earring will not make them unequip.

It's simply that an equipment can't help equip ITSELF but in this case the 3 equips help each other.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Should a Warrior starts pumping DEX for the new equips? - by Shidoshi - 2011-01-13, 12:33 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)