ill agree the wording can be better. but that sentence has a contrast, maybe even a paradox.
it is implied that i said "luk is better". it is also implied that i said "dex is worse". and because dex is worse, it seems strange to say that "dex is far more important".
dex is the stat you manipulate more. because you want to avoid doing things like adding more to dex. it is the 'worse' stat after all. with luk, you just add more and more and more. you dont need to watch for anything.
when i wrote this, i was targeting people who were interested in making low dex but have no idea how to do it. i also assumed i should be able to communicate with them in english but i didnt keep people who spoke little english in mind.
honestly, i had a hard time answering the question: if luk is more important, and dex is less significant, why should people care about dex more than luk?
it is implied that i said "luk is better". it is also implied that i said "dex is worse". and because dex is worse, it seems strange to say that "dex is far more important".
dex is the stat you manipulate more. because you want to avoid doing things like adding more to dex. it is the 'worse' stat after all. with luk, you just add more and more and more. you dont need to watch for anything.
when i wrote this, i was targeting people who were interested in making low dex but have no idea how to do it. i also assumed i should be able to communicate with them in english but i didnt keep people who spoke little english in mind.
honestly, i had a hard time answering the question: if luk is more important, and dex is less significant, why should people care about dex more than luk?