2008-07-07, 02:39 PM
(This post was last modified: 2008-07-07, 02:44 PM by MonkyMagic.)
Hazzy Wrote:The 163 require Luk though. Won't that see there's some balance? :f6:
Nope, Maybe if the 163 weapons had a lower luk requirement and a higher MA, but luk mages lose out on over a 100ma as these weapons are currently, compared to lukless mages as Saver said

