Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sad Indeed...
#69
Almandaragal Wrote:Lolobnoxioustroll?

Seriously, your elitist opinions reflected in your dismissal of non Bishop magicians has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

However, actually addressing the topic, I had done rough estimates with only the vaguest numbers at one point while training and got similar results. In the end though, what's 5k on an ultimate? Sure, it's some notable levels possibly 1 hitting earlier, but that only really matters assuming both Arch Mages are using the same level ultimate. Generally speaking, one can pump points into an ultimate to make up for the distance from 1 hitting something. Besides, it's not like we use ultimates to seriously boss (Zak is a joke to most people by 130 if they don't remember the days where it took 14x+ people with only 3rd job skills and no apples), so the damage difference is even less. Lukless will always have the advantage, assuming Nexon doesn't go back to their roots. As far as I'm concerned, it's not going to happen from all of the Masteria equipment that favors low secondary/no secondary stat classes. I guess the one reason we have to be greatful for in our horrid magic formula is that even if you can bust out 99,999 with an ultimate 15 levels earlier given same stat equipment, it really doesn't matter much.

I'm not overly happy that they didn't put some luk requirement on the 130 staff, like, say, 90-110 or something so as to force someone to use luk equips or add luk, but we're having enough trouble getting Nexon to make them do what they're supposed to at this point (Including nerf holy magic). I'd rather have them like they're "supposed" to be, lukless BS advantage and all, than not have them. At least there is a chance to not have everything based solely on your stats for strength with them.

No.I meant [COLOR="White"]lolarchmages and lollukless will not domain at all Smile[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Red"]
Bishop FTW & Lowluk FTW also x3
[/COLOR]

[COLOR="Red"]even tho i got some "infraction"
i was thinking... i have to add to this luk/lowluk mages get more stats from zhelm and ht pend
i get 47 stats from my zhelm wich is 16 luk and 31int, a lukless mage would only get 31 int
so ht pend+1 gives me 44 stats, and a lukless mage only 22int[/COLOR]
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Sad Indeed... - by butterfλi - 2008-08-28, 09:47 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Corn - 2008-08-28, 09:53 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Eriko - 2008-08-28, 09:56 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-08-28, 09:57 PM
Sad Indeed... - by butterfλi - 2008-08-28, 10:05 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-08-28, 10:11 PM
Sad Indeed... - by butterfλi - 2008-08-28, 10:18 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-08-28, 10:21 PM
Sad Indeed... - by randompeep - 2008-08-28, 10:24 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Eriko - 2008-08-28, 10:27 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Blankout - 2008-08-28, 10:27 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-08-28, 10:30 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Eriko - 2008-08-28, 10:36 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-08-28, 10:40 PM
Sad Indeed... - by butterfλi - 2008-08-28, 10:51 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Cyanne - 2008-08-28, 11:01 PM
Sad Indeed... - by butterfλi - 2008-08-28, 11:20 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Magus - 2008-08-28, 11:25 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Bribery - 2008-08-28, 11:26 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Magus - 2008-08-28, 11:30 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Bribery - 2008-08-28, 11:36 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Tikey - 2008-08-28, 11:38 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Cyanne - 2008-08-28, 11:40 PM
Sad Indeed... - by butterfλi - 2008-08-29, 12:16 AM
Sad Indeed... - by LazyBui - 2008-08-29, 04:21 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Haiku - 2008-08-29, 05:59 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-08-29, 06:58 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Five Second Pose - 2008-08-29, 08:28 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Haiku - 2008-08-29, 09:11 AM
Sad Indeed... - by LazyBui - 2008-08-29, 10:16 AM
Sad Indeed... - by butterfλi - 2008-08-29, 10:43 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Harrisonized - 2008-08-29, 02:32 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Haiku - 2008-08-29, 05:30 PM
Sad Indeed... - by butterfλi - 2008-08-29, 08:40 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Harrisonized - 2008-08-29, 08:53 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-08-29, 09:42 PM
Sad Indeed... - by LazyBui - 2008-08-31, 06:15 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Silence - 2008-08-31, 10:36 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Hazzy - 2008-08-31, 10:44 AM
Sad Indeed... - by randompeep - 2008-08-31, 10:56 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Hazzy - 2008-08-31, 10:58 AM
Sad Indeed... - by randompeep - 2008-08-31, 11:12 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Russt - 2008-08-31, 12:28 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Goals - 2008-09-06, 04:06 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-09-06, 04:10 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Goals - 2008-09-06, 05:12 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-09-06, 05:30 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Bribery - 2008-09-06, 09:54 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-09-07, 04:50 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Goals - 2008-09-07, 11:32 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Kabanaw - 2008-09-07, 11:39 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Magus - 2008-09-07, 01:29 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Russt - 2008-09-07, 01:41 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Goals - 2008-09-07, 02:01 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Magus - 2008-09-07, 02:14 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Russt - 2008-09-07, 02:20 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Goals - 2008-09-07, 02:25 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Magus - 2008-09-07, 02:26 PM
Sad Indeed... - by xLeviathan - 2008-09-08, 10:05 AM
Sad Indeed... - by kIkO - 2008-09-10, 10:59 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Molly - 2008-09-10, 01:54 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Derimed - 2008-09-10, 02:25 PM
Sad Indeed... - by kIkO - 2008-09-10, 03:58 PM
Sad Indeed... - by Tiff - 2008-09-10, 10:35 PM
Sad Indeed... - by kIkO - 2008-09-11, 08:52 AM
Sad Indeed... - by LordVader - 2008-09-11, 10:05 AM
Sad Indeed... - by kIkO - 2008-09-11, 10:57 AM
Sad Indeed... - by Almandaragal - 2008-09-11, 11:22 AM
Sad Indeed... - by kIkO - 2008-09-11, 11:45 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)