2010-10-31, 05:12 AM
People on this forum keep talking about BB bringing a W7/Vista capable client. Where did people get this idea?
Here are people talking about a W7/Vista client:
- sicnarf
- Atuan
- larmie
Only Atuan's shows any sort of proof here with a before and after BB screen, but that only shows resource optimization and has nothing to do with compatibility. If anything, I believe the addition of the eTracer in GMS's recent patch shows that the new client does not magically fix all of the W7/Vista disconnection issues. After all, if it did, there would be no need for the eTracer program.
Looking at these posts, however, I only see declarations and no proof of it. Considering the gravity of the matter, I believe some proof is in order to really determine if such a client is coming. So can someone show me some evidence that the Big Bang client is in any way more compatible with W7/Vista? Is it in patch notes... posted on the KMS(T) site... where? I'd really like to see evidence of this, and I'd like to know the sources of the people who I quoted above.
Here are people talking about a W7/Vista client:
- sicnarf
- Atuan
- larmie
Only Atuan's shows any sort of proof here with a before and after BB screen, but that only shows resource optimization and has nothing to do with compatibility. If anything, I believe the addition of the eTracer in GMS's recent patch shows that the new client does not magically fix all of the W7/Vista disconnection issues. After all, if it did, there would be no need for the eTracer program.
Looking at these posts, however, I only see declarations and no proof of it. Considering the gravity of the matter, I believe some proof is in order to really determine if such a client is coming. So can someone show me some evidence that the Big Bang client is in any way more compatible with W7/Vista? Is it in patch notes... posted on the KMS(T) site... where? I'd really like to see evidence of this, and I'd like to know the sources of the people who I quoted above.