2010-10-11, 08:02 PM
It will depend on potential outcomes, and different in situations.
Take your total weapon attack without the belt (be it with echo, enrage, apple), and look at your attack ratio: (10-4)/total att (no belt) = x
Your total % str without the belt, and I need to know what you'll be comparing to, say 15% str on the 2-line and 21% str on the 3-line (depends how ambitious you are really), call it 'a' and 'b', and look at % ratio: (b-a)/total % str (no belt) = y
If y is greater than x, 4 att 3-line belt is better, otherwise the reverse is true.
Ex. Total weapon att without belt = 250, % str without belt = 220% str (base is 100%, so 120% bonus)
x = 6/250, y = 6/220, it's obvious that y is greater than x so the 3-line belt wins in this scenario.
Take your total weapon attack without the belt (be it with echo, enrage, apple), and look at your attack ratio: (10-4)/total att (no belt) = x
Your total % str without the belt, and I need to know what you'll be comparing to, say 15% str on the 2-line and 21% str on the 3-line (depends how ambitious you are really), call it 'a' and 'b', and look at % ratio: (b-a)/total % str (no belt) = y
If y is greater than x, 4 att 3-line belt is better, otherwise the reverse is true.
Ex. Total weapon att without belt = 250, % str without belt = 220% str (base is 100%, so 120% bonus)
x = 6/250, y = 6/220, it's obvious that y is greater than x so the 3-line belt wins in this scenario.