Harrisonized Wrote:So, someone kills your mom, and you wanted revenge. Would you go kill the person's family, friends, everyone? Huge error in your logic. I agree with the other guy that you should stop talking because your statements lack logic.I meant people who were already on the to-ban list. <_<
Quote:Ok. On Halloween, someone puts candy in a jar on their front door. No notice, no nothing. Wouldn't you go take the candy, assuming that it's there because the owner's out and doesn't feel like answering the door?....
Suddenly, the owner comes out and says he'll sue you because you stole candy from him.
It's Halloween, one can expect it to be for Tricker-Treaters. Anyone with a brain can realize that Bigfoot was suppose to be a Boss, it's weakness to poison was unintended. Two and a half million experience in 40 seconds? Come'on. <_<
Doing it on any other day would probably keep anyone from going up and grabbing it.
Dervish Wrote:1: People who have never once killed Bigfoot, or benefitted from Bigfoot in any way are being banned.
2: People who have done nothing wrong, or have barely logged on are being banned.
3: Someone BROUGHT UP the fact that Bigfoot could be poisoned to Prose in the Q&A before the pineappleing patch went live, and you know what? HE IMPLIED IT WAS INTENTIONAL!
1. There's more than one reason to be banned. <_<
Maybe they're using some program that clocks experience in time, anyone that got 2.6 million in 40 seconds, or something close, would be targeted.
2. See #1.
3. "Implied" changes from person to person. Unless he said "Yes, we wanted it like that", it isn't Okay. If I remember correctly, he said they were trying for the stunnable status.

