Afrobean Wrote:I know this is "lolinternets" and such, but I gotta be honest-- I have no respect for you if you're going to say what you're saying in the way you're saying it. The worst part is that you might well have a good case to be made, but because you put forth your ideas in the way you did, I simply can't bring myself to truly care the slightest about what you have to say.
Also, I'm getting kind of tired of people going "omg if he dies we'd have young lady president to deal with". Would this really be a problem? I honestly don't understand it. People complaining about "lack of experience", but this person has served much more time in the executive branch than Obama, than Biden, more even than McCain (protip: all of them- aside from her- are at a whopping 0). I almost want to call you all out as sexists, because quitefrankly, that is the only logical problem I can see anyone having against her that is not an inherent property of other folks on the tickets.
Incidentally, could you cite a source on your claims about the child with down syndrome? Perhaps it is these wikipedia bandits again, but I'm not seeing anything of the sort here, and frankly, the burden of proof always falls on the one making unverified claims.
i can not see any way i would be called a sexist against my own sex? [confused]
not all people who have an issue with her are sexists or should be put that category.
uhh, it's been on CNN and MSNBC. - a few links :
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/...storyemail
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/...15378.html
>>anyways, you stated nice points. and we both have different opinions. as i came into this topic to state my opinion, not to aruge. thanks for your opinions on me, though. (: