2008-08-31, 04:22 PM
Why would it matter more?
It depends on the ratio of weapon attack to AP.
In terms of weapon attack, dexless sins < sins < dexless dits = strless archers (wut) < dits = archers < warriors.
In terms of AP (keeping in mind that secondary stat adds some fraction proportional to primary stat), sins = dits < archers = warriors < dexless sins < dexless dits.
So if you take a ratio of AP/weapon attack:
dits = warriors < archers < dexless dits < strless archers < sins < dexless sins.
In terms of how much attack is worth.
Yes, this did involve quite a few generalizations, but it's roughly how it should be. The more accurate way is to say "too many ifs" like Carlos did and just use the calculator.
It depends on the ratio of weapon attack to AP.
In terms of weapon attack, dexless sins < sins < dexless dits = strless archers (wut) < dits = archers < warriors.
In terms of AP (keeping in mind that secondary stat adds some fraction proportional to primary stat), sins = dits < archers = warriors < dexless sins < dexless dits.
So if you take a ratio of AP/weapon attack:
dits = warriors < archers < dexless dits < strless archers < sins < dexless sins.
In terms of how much attack is worth.
Yes, this did involve quite a few generalizations, but it's roughly how it should be. The more accurate way is to say "too many ifs" like Carlos did and just use the calculator.