2008-08-29, 08:40 PM
Harrisonized Wrote:Can you calculate the amount loss for the level 103 staff. I'm pretty sure those will be cheaper than the lukless staves as well.
[indent]Okay, so in my original post, I was blind for not bothering to compare more. I was taking the BEST of lukless and comparing it to the WORSE of luk. Which was bad. [/indent]
Using the same stats (1000 magic and 570 spell attack), I compared some other weapons. Some interesting things did come up.
*I will be referring the weapons' difference by their levels because I don't want to type level every time.
70 | 85matk | 0 luk -- lukless
103 | 118matk | 105 luk -- luk
130 | 145matk | 0 luk -- lukless
163 | 178matk | 165 luk -- luk
70 vs 103
Spoiler
70 vs 163
Spoiler
103 vs 163
Spoiler
103 vs 130
Spoiler
General Conclusion:
If you compare a lukless with a normal weapon, the luk can finally catch up to the lukless. But with the level 70 lukless weapon, things go unbalanced again unless the luk can pull out ~68 luk from helm, pendant, maple warrior, shoes, where ever. Then they'll be equal. But with the level 130, it IS possible for to catch up (as in if the luk mage can pull out ~87 luk without losing int). But the effort is just so difficult that it's probably better to stay lukless.
Lastly, the level 130 lukless elemental staff is the root of all evil, is the last diminished candle, is the rain on a sunny day, is the tear from your hamster, is the Neil Armstrong when you're Michael Collins, and is unfair beyond life and death. kbye.


