2008-08-29, 10:43 AM
Both luk and lukless has amp, so who cares? They both benefit.
Bui, I know what you're saying and I'm not sure if you trying to pick an argument with me or agreeing with me. Because I already said that luk loses out (which is unfortunate because of many reasons like people who didn't make a lukless when gMS was released). Now, if you want to consider things like luk from item maker, shoes, gloves, whatever, you don't get a big enough boost to compete with the level 130.
There are luk magicians in gMS that are stronger than lukless at the moment as the "Top Magic for Their Level" thread back at sw from Afrobean has shown. The problem is that the level 130 just has waaay too much matk and not requiring any luk.
So all you're doing is including all these side stats from equips but you're still proving the same point that was established: "too bad, so sad" to luk magicians.
You can include 4-8 luk from maple warrior if you want; I really didn't mind or bother with ANY side equipment; The point of the thread was trying to solve the issue of price for lukless: should lukless convert to luk so that they can use a cheaper elemental weapon? The answer was no. If the numbers came out to be close, then maybe we can get complex with equipments too see if it was worth it. But the numbers just make it not worth it to convert.
LazyBui Wrote:I suppose if you had 15-25 additional luk, that'd be a help, but it still doesn't even come close to making the 163 staff equal, which is what makes me so angry. It's the highest level weapon in the game and it's just as terrible as the level 55 staff except it has an elemental boost.
I know this has been mentioned before, but all wands/staves that aren't lukless or Doomsday are functionally equivalent - the luk requirement completely negates the increase in magic attack because they both increase by the same number.
Personally, I find that it sucks balls that I made a luk magician at the very start of global (read: literally the only option at the time) and it ends up that I can't even make it compete because of things I could not have ever possibly foreseen.. but that's a bit off track.
Bui, I know what you're saying and I'm not sure if you trying to pick an argument with me or agreeing with me. Because I already said that luk loses out (which is unfortunate because of many reasons like people who didn't make a lukless when gMS was released). Now, if you want to consider things like luk from item maker, shoes, gloves, whatever, you don't get a big enough boost to compete with the level 130.
There are luk magicians in gMS that are stronger than lukless at the moment as the "Top Magic for Their Level" thread back at sw from Afrobean has shown. The problem is that the level 130 just has waaay too much matk and not requiring any luk.
So all you're doing is including all these side stats from equips but you're still proving the same point that was established: "too bad, so sad" to luk magicians.
You can include 4-8 luk from maple warrior if you want; I really didn't mind or bother with ANY side equipment; The point of the thread was trying to solve the issue of price for lukless: should lukless convert to luk so that they can use a cheaper elemental weapon? The answer was no. If the numbers came out to be close, then maybe we can get complex with equipments too see if it was worth it. But the numbers just make it not worth it to convert.