2010-08-15, 03:49 PM
Chuey Wrote:That was in regard to you saying that hacking was related. Sorry if I misread your context, just seemed like you implied it, yet it can't really be proved. Your major points in this thread were about the weapons, but you weren't really acknowledging the hacking. Not like you could have anyway, so I guess my point wasn't very meaningful. At all.
I didn't mention the hackings because don't play enough to know that hacking is going on at a wide scale. Why acknowledge something that i have no way of proving myself, especially when my first point is already true? :/
Chuey Wrote:After re-examining the thread, I'm gonna notice that it was the thread starter who started this whole scenario. Guess I fail at details. But hey, while it may have been a rude move made by him first, fighting fire with fire doesn't do anything. But no, I suppose you aren't to blame here. Gonna leave it at that. .-.
Fighting fire with fire is one thing, but fighting fire with fire and reasoning is another. If i was out of line i'd be infracted by now, but the only reason that doesn't happen is because i still prove my points.

