Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS?
#17
ClawofBeta Wrote:Wahh...?

Where did you get that from?

I knew one attack equals more luck as you get higher and higher as a level...but what?

Common sense.

Increase of damage per added attack is (luk * 3.6 + str + dex) / 100 (for max dmg)

if dex is lowered and luk is increased, you'll have an increase in base stats before applying weapon attack in. Therefore, if both paths can use an equip, luckless would be off better if the items contains attack.

Oh and yeah, it favours dexless, but doesn't annihilate a normal dex.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Corn - 2008-08-28, 02:27 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Corn - 2008-08-28, 02:35 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Corn - 2008-08-28, 02:43 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Corn - 2008-08-28, 03:14 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Nikkey - 2008-08-28, 04:06 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Corn - 2008-08-28, 04:11 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Corn - 2008-08-28, 04:18 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Corn - 2008-08-28, 04:23 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Acim - 2008-08-28, 04:32 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Izzah - 2008-08-28, 06:20 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Magus - 2008-08-30, 03:58 AM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Arroz - 2008-08-31, 04:30 PM
The ___-less path, the downfall of MS? - by Hatsu - 2008-12-02, 08:25 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)