About exp distribution.

 Backstory

Okay, so yesterday a guildie of mine was looking for someone to come leech at Skeles. They said they would get more exp that way, anyways. I assumed that was because of HS. So I offered to go on my Hp Warrior, which was 60 at the time.

They said I had to be 108+ to leech. I said no problem, I have PG. I still get exp; no big deal. I was refused once again. Other members of the guild kept on saying that the exp distribution won't work right if I'm not of leeching level (108+). I tried to ask for a proper explanation of why the exp distribution will get messed up, but none of them could provide a proper answer. They kept going back and forth about party bonus exp, and regular exp, and HS, killing faster than I hit with PG, etc. At this point, I concluded that they were making up random excuses because they didn't want me there.

I was shot down a final time with, "the point is, they will get less exp. they won't train with you".

Let's take a training party at Skeles. Actually, the one that I was not accepted into.

2 DBs, and a Priest/Bishop.

Let's say that I were to enter the party on my Hp Warrior. The exp for them would get boosted because HS works better with more people in the party, right? I would hit the Skeles with PG, and I would then get exp from that. Most likely around the same that a person would get for just leeching at 108+.

Exp for them goes up because of an extra member, and I take some away from PG leeching. Is that not the same as a person 108+ just sitting there leeching? Actually, a person leeching regularly would get exp form every kill, whereas PG leeching would only get me exp from the ones I actually hit.

Can someone clear this up for me? 'Cause I'm rather unsatisfied with, "they just get less exp"...