2010-06-23, 03:12 PM
Probably the best approximation possible for the data set:
(0.06044) * x ^ (3.687)
Including error bars:
(0.06044 +/- 0.01744) * x ^ (3.687 +/- 0.07587)
Finding a function that will perfectly model that data is nearly impossible with those flat lines. Although one exists, it will be ridiculously long. Probably the best way to find an good approximation would be to chop it up between the flat areas, and smashing it into one equation.
Do we have the experience values from 51-200?
(0.06044) * x ^ (3.687)
Including error bars:
(0.06044 +/- 0.01744) * x ^ (3.687 +/- 0.07587)
Finding a function that will perfectly model that data is nearly impossible with those flat lines. Although one exists, it will be ridiculously long. Probably the best way to find an good approximation would be to chop it up between the flat areas, and smashing it into one equation.
Do we have the experience values from 51-200?

