2010-06-22, 09:31 PM
Bribery Wrote:Yeah I'm not complaining since I am an EvanIt's just that Arch Mages still don't have a place in bossing after these changes. Bishops are better for buffs and Evans are better for damage (and Magical Resistance).
But it's nice to see that Nexon didn't overlook the fact that they were making FP better than IL in nearly every way. I think CL being stronger than Paralyze is a fair trade off.
Not after Ewands and Amp, in the case of CL at least. I wonder if Ewands and Amp will affect their summons now that they have the correct elements.
But as an F/P I never even wanted good mobbing. I don't understand why Nexon had to make paralyze hit 6 targets. When i picked my class, the way they described it was I/L for mob and F/P for damage.
Gimme something I can boss with D:
I think paralyze should remain a single target attack that's good for 1vs1. Whats the point of having 2 great mobbing skills at 4th job (Bigbang AND Paralyze?), especially when F/P mages aren't supposed to be able to freeze in the first place >:|
Training like that would mean : paralyze, paralyze, and big bang/meteor to kill frozen mobs
sounds like the way an Ice/Lightning mage is supposed to train :\
Edit* also, if we are fire/POISON mages, then wouldn't it be awesome if we had some skill with a cooldown that debuffed bosses? or maybe a poison which hurt bosses too, but give it a seperate formula only for monsters with boss tag
Cuz i think I can speak for all F/P archmages, when i say that we don't really feel the poison aspect of our class in 4th job.