2010-06-21, 08:49 AM
Pride Wrote:Too bad LUKless will be pwnt someday with the new formula
Is there any real proof of that, other than that one screenshot of a Bishop missing something?
Another screenshot showed a Bishop with 4 base LUK but a high magic accuracy number.
In another thread, they were saying magic damage was something like (A*INT+B*LUK)*MATT/100, so LUKless shouldn't be much disadvantage, if that is true.
Found it: (I still haven't learned how to pull quotes from other threads)
http://www.southperry.net/showthread.php?t=28250&page=5
Dusk:
" The magician formula seems to be AROUND (3.4*INT + 1.3* LUK) * (MAT/100). Doesn't fit all cases. "