Post an image that you think of when you read this.

Yes, but the design does.

Content.

You can see the actual realistic portion to the art, along with it's surreal nature.

You might argue I cut out the "realistic portion", being the breasts in this image, but this image is certainly more cartoony that real. Yet it counts as surreal, even without having to draw extreme detail to make it stand out as "real" objects. Your mind can tell that they're real objects even without drawing every single wrinkle and crack, right? It has nice shading, without that this would just look like a screenshot from a cartoon.

 Spoiler

That's just a weird little animu girl with a knife and a pretty background.

I would agree this image would fall under abstract. I said before that perhaps it would make you feel better if I actually split them up into groups of surreal and abstract.
That particular image is more akin to this:

 Spoiler

Which I would define as abstract, but not far into abstract.

Would you not say that the first image of that exact post is not surreal?




What of this? Is this surreal to you? Oh wait, it can't possibly be, by the definitions you've given. So what is it?