2010-05-05, 02:05 PM
Takebacker Wrote:You misunderstand. Of course it makes sense. (i'm majoring in a business school, how could it not?) I'm talking about "Why should they care about fixing things in a timely manner if they're not losing money?" If that's how they want to run the company, fine. I'm not going to argue against it because obviously since money makes the damn world go 'round, why bother arguing against it when it clearly works? The only thing i'm arguing here is morals and ethics, neither of which exist in that s'hitty business model.
Well, Maple is free to play. That seems moral/ethical enough to me. How is it unethical/immoral for Nexon to not respond to the needs of a minority?