Heidi Wrote:Sarah, is it that you have trouble following the rules or that you think you should be allowed to break them every now and again? o_o
It has nothing to do with me feeling like I'm above any laws, or having difficulty following any rules. Two of my three current infractions were based on something entirely out of my control; circumstances that occurred long after I had made my initial post. I don't go out looking to be infracted or to cause trouble.
I feel that has sufficiently answered your question, and I will refrain from speaking further on this issue as I feel you are attempting to bait me into flaming you, as there are few other ways for me to respond to these rude comments you're making. Please keep your thoughts about me to yourself, as I have not attacked anyone in this thread and it is highly inappropriate for you to bring this here.
Fiel Wrote:As now is the time for discussing new ideas for the new rules, we ought to cover our bases as best as possible. Considering that the method of banning is changing with this new iteration, it is in SP's best interest that we choose the best banning system for ourselves. Let's focus on the issue instead of focusing on the people. I think the third option sounds closest to what is already being done and has worked successfully already in SP. What do you say to the third option?
The third option is the option I feel is best for both the user and the community, which is why I did not take the time to rebut it. It's simple, gives everyone involved a chance to cool off and think, and most importantly, doesn't isolate anyone who actually cares about the site.

