y0y0y0y0shi0 Wrote:I do partially agree with the multiple accounts statement. Back during the iTCG crisis (when the codes didn't work), I sent in a ticket with said codes and information clearly stating that I had multiple accounts. They ended up compensating me for my codes, and had no acknowledgment of the fact that I had multiple accounts.
However, using similar logic to your own, we could create this scenario:
Advertiser: "COME TO MY WEBSITEZ BUY MY GOLDZ NOWZ!"
Advertiser waits for the post to be deleted.
Admin deletes post.
Advertiser: "COME TO MY WEBSITEZ BUY MY GOLDZ NOWZ!"
Cycle continues.
Therefor, the advertiser is not spamming because he is waiting for his post to be deleted BEFORE making a new post.
Whether or not you wait for the ticket to be deleted does not matter. Continuing to send multiple tickets on the same issue when you have already clearly been addressed is not morally sound. Secondly, just because you have received automated tickets, does not mean you will not be addressed. Going back to the iTCG story; I had received an automated response on the issue before receiving my compensation. Whether your response is automated or not, does not matter. And, if you dislike their judgment, I have no idea how you would survive in the real world with these kinds of issues. "Hey judge, I don't like your judgment so I'm going to continue coming in here and receiving the same trial over and over again until you make a new judgment." It's just not right.
LOL, Comparing the real world with a Online game? Come on now that's pretty stupid...They are unbanning people for me doing the samething as others I would understand and accept my ban hammer if they didn't unban some people, that's the point of why I was pretty upset...And Ia ctually accepted my ban hammer uptill a lot of people were getting unbanned.
As for the advertiser, he's not making a new thread because of at least a near situation I'm in, there's no comparison at all.
Quote:Sincerity, responsibility, maturity. Accept what you've done, pay your pennance, and wait it out. You may not get the result you seek but if you are respectful the chances are much higher than if you go in there kicking up a pomegranatestorm.
So I wait for them to respond toa Closed ticket? I mean what I actually be "waiting it out" for?
Quote:You only got infracted for calling me retarded. If you had left that out you would have been golden. And yes, spamming their forums and spamming their ticketing system are the same. They're both a minor annoyance that only prove your immaturity and inability to handle situations maturely. I'm not really going to argue with you about "being on Nexon's sack" (uh...) because I absolutely agree with their punishment of the offenders here; but that's a forbidden subject. Agreeing with the way they've dealt with the chaos scroll incident is in no way the same as "being on their sack". I do not agree with the way they're handling ticketing, though I do empathise with them having to deal with potentially hundreds of tickets by people like NatureDragon or those unable to take a hint who repeatedly send tickets demanding they be unblocked.
I can only assume it's too late for your case now, regardless of how many tickets you send, because if you weren't able to do it right the first time I doubt you could change their minds now. I have in other topics given an outline of how to handle yourself, but it seems you expect me to right a mock-ticket for you. Here is what I would have written.
I'm immature for making a new ticket after there closed? I'm not even flamming them anyway I'm asking them to please recheck my account and such. It's not like I was gonna go to the fourms and make new threads over and over and say "nexon sucks, you're gay I hate you" I'm being as polite as possible each time I remake a ticket.
I think the way I'm handling the would actually be the mature way of handling it and not making tickets and say "unban me now plz".

