2010-04-13, 08:13 PM
Excellent comment about nature v. nurture, Paul, and yet that same argument has been applied to the origins of homosexuality, as documented in the Biology of sexual orientation article posted here several times. My point is, the simple fact that the nurture argument makes logical sense does not disprove the potential end product of variance in sexual orientation.
Regardless, I don't want to contribute much more to the realm of counterargument so as to leave the opportunity open for all different opinions. However, I would like to continue posting articles as food-for-thought. So, without further ado: WebMD: Is there a gay gene?
Regardless, I don't want to contribute much more to the realm of counterargument so as to leave the opportunity open for all different opinions. However, I would like to continue posting articles as food-for-thought. So, without further ado: WebMD: Is there a gay gene?