2010-04-13, 01:37 PM
Horusmaster Wrote:Just look at google, it's not bundled with anything, there's yahoo, ask, and now bing. All the search engines have similiar performance, it's only the fact that google was first in the market that makes it have 90% of the market share.Google weren't the first. They were simply better at doing searches than anyone else.
Horusmaster Wrote:The same could be said about IE. It's true through advanced javascript test other browsers are much faster. but to the user, it's no difference. (In fact some of my friends I've recommended FF to says they still prefer IE, since IE takes 1 second to start up while FF takes 5 seconds. And they constantly get the "firefox is already running" when they reopen the browser very fast, which is a habit of IE users) User wouldn't see much of a difference when a website loads in 0.5 second or 0.05 second.Just to point it out, it's not about quality. It's about what Fiel elaborated.
Horusmaster Wrote:Now what about the number of songs apple's itune have sold? all apple products requires you to install iTune, isn't that a monopoly?Amount of songs sold on iTunes are irrelevant. And I've installed QuickTime (AND uninstalled it, mind you) without installing iTunes.

