Ceddybear Wrote:That means women and men who have disabilities and cannot reproduce should not be allowed to marry. Why do we allow condoms ? it stops reproduction. Birth control pills, abortions. All of that is allowed and Gay marriage is not ? And Even if my partners child is not biologically mine it does not mean I will not take care of it like my own. (think I went off subject).
No. It means that if you're going to support gay marriage then you should also support male-animal relationships, male-plant relationships, male-inanimate object relationships, and so forth. People who believe in gay marriage believe that they are liberals and are oppressed. But the truth of the matter is that this notion is only with respect to a biased form of social engineering that lies and creates make believe dichotomies to make people believe that they are a "minority" when this opinion is actually a major social construct that people can relate and understand. I seriously believe that animals are intelligent and should be respected a lot more than the way we treat them in our society. I am grateful for their sacrifice and entertain the possibility that I am eating an equally intelligent if not smarter organism that simply does not share similar linguistic capabilities. The truth of the matter is that people argue that homosexual marriages should be allowed because it is fair. The world is cruel and unfair. Democracy is nothing more than mob mentality and false dichotomies (Democrats or Republicans). If we were to truly be "fair" and change "unfair" rules, then marriage should incorporate every type of relationship instead of exclusively being limited to only one, two, or three types of relationships.
I don't care if anyone is gay, straight, bestiality, or anything else. Who or what you love is none of my concern. I think that this form of equalized apathy towards judging other people's relationships has caused me to decide to treat all factors equally when it comes to absolutely being "fair." After all, all normative opinions are relative. Yes I truly believe that it is possible for someone to love a doll as much as a real woman. Yes it is sad. But who are we to judge one idea as being right and another idea as being wrong because we're biased. Allowing gay marriage will result in social change. But it won't really result in real social change. To me at least, it will seem shallow. Like everything else in the world. When it comes down to it, who decides what can be defined as a radical revolution? Certainly not me. I'm clearly insane.