2010-04-06, 02:23 AM
You didn't make a distinction between real C++ and visual C++,so assuming the former I voted for that.
If I had to take a Microsoft bastardization of a language I'd rather do VB.NET (although you didn't specify VB or VB.NET either, and both are still actively used and entirely different) though because it literally comes down to nothing more than stylistic preferences and the looser structure is faster and less cluttered.
If I had to take a Microsoft bastardization of a language I'd rather do VB.NET (although you didn't specify VB or VB.NET either, and both are still actively used and entirely different) though because it literally comes down to nothing more than stylistic preferences and the looser structure is faster and less cluttered.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.