What is so bad about Meg Griffin?

How typical. Those who agree that the unwarranted abuse of an individual is justified because of one's physical appearance offer no objective reasoning for their beliefs, and skip straight to personal attacks. I would say that I am disappointed, but in a way I expected this. Wanted this, even. To answer your question: I have taken many men and women to my personal quarters, and none of them were as perfect as Meg Griffin. While this statement may seem odd initially, it is actually quite rational for reasons I have already discussed. And even if I denied your irrelevant questioning: if I said no, arguing that sex was overrated and acknowledged that Meg was in fact hideous, would it warrant her constant abuse? I say it would not, but your beliefs indicate otherwise. Your responses are complete non sequiturs. I am afraid that -- unless you are actually going somewhere with your personal questions, which I will continue to answer in ways that favor my argument -- I must dismiss your posts as despicable trolling.

Would Meg Griffin accuse other people of being trolls?