2010-03-11, 09:23 PM
(This post was last modified: 2010-03-11, 09:41 PM by 2147483647.)
Then point out the incorrect logic. You have no business posting unless you can do so.
So far all I did conformed to the rules of mathematics. You can replace the constant with x because the constant is increased to an infinite number.
Then what is? Should I redo this using lim 1/10^x as x approaches infinity? I assure you it'd come out the same.
V Sorry I posted before you edited and still had a doublepost. V
shouri Wrote:1=0 implies that you at some point you did something you shouldn't have (or applied incorrect logic).
And the following sentence of yours is an incorrect conclusion. Saying that 1/x accounts for something just because you got 1=0 is incorrect and so is saying that THAT incorrect assumption is actual proof that 1=/=.9999....
You can't replace a constant with a variable like that 0.o
So far all I did conformed to the rules of mathematics. You can replace the constant with x because the constant is increased to an infinite number.
shouri Wrote:Lim x/x is NOT a generalization of lim 1/x done infinitely many times.
Then what is? Should I redo this using lim 1/10^x as x approaches infinity? I assure you it'd come out the same.
V Sorry I posted before you edited and still had a doublepost. V
