2010-03-10, 06:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 2010-03-10, 09:24 PM by madanthony.)
Wow, pineapple the picture caption in that article. "Blah blah child porn. Similar [caveat] graphic novels are [implied to be readily available to your impressionable children]". I can't find where it was I read it - I think it was an Answerman response on ANN - but I think the seven items in question were some doujinshi, so I can see why there's a chance they were a little beyond the bounds of acceptable. At the same time though, it was within a larger order of otherwise acceptable material and his whole collection was described by his lawyer as "encyclopedic and vast".
Lawyer's commentary.
Very belated edit because I don't want to double post and because it's keeping up with being off topic:
Kara no Kyoukai: Hit and miss. I fell asleep during the first episode. Way too quiet. Probably why I conked, I need some music. Plot was both right up my alley and way out of my interest. Fifth episode was my favorite. Art was so good the standard style of the characters felt like they were pasted over some of the backgrounds, like a character just standing around in a VN.
Lawyer's commentary.
Very belated edit because I don't want to double post and because it's keeping up with being off topic:
Kara no Kyoukai: Hit and miss. I fell asleep during the first episode. Way too quiet. Probably why I conked, I need some music. Plot was both right up my alley and way out of my interest. Fifth episode was my favorite. Art was so good the standard style of the characters felt like they were pasted over some of the backgrounds, like a character just standing around in a VN.