GM Hacked - FAQ finally answered!

So you won't trust him about how he got hacked but you'll trust him that he downloaded hacks?
And at that, you don't think that you would be able to trust someone who openly admits they downloaded hacks? If they openly admit they downloaded hacks, I'm pretty sure they wouldn't beat around the bush about HOW they were hacked.

ASSUMING this is true (I'm still sort of skeptical. This is coming from the person who spammed the Sleepywood thread with complete crap. >.>) I wonder if he knows about the database exploit. It doesn't seem like he would, based on his method of hacking, but with a hacker of his caliber, you never do know.

Admitting downloading hacks = fact.
Believing someone hacked you = speculation unless he sat there, watching Ecko log onto his account.

He's openly admitting to his belief of how he got attacked but he has no proof that Ecko actually did it short of an IP check or some other guaranteed source. A lot of people claim to have been hacked by ecko yet only a portion of them actually were. It's like the Taliban. They do terrorist attacks but it doesn't mean all terrorist attacks are perpetrated by them, even if they claim they are. It's an easy way of instilling fear, by using a feared and well known presence.