2010-02-23, 08:42 PM
Khoi has recently made a number of people very, very angry, including me. However, as anger serves no function in a successful rebuttal, I will simply state objectively that money and greed shape Khoi's thinking. Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone's opinions, nor do I intend to demean Khoi personally for his beliefs or worldviews. But I do feel that I must help you reflect and reexamine your views on Khoi.
If I didn't sincerely believe that Khoi's intellectual dishonesty, mismanagement of facts, and outright lies make the most nettlesome upstarts you'll ever see seem ready for sainthood, in comparison, then I wouldn't be writing this letter. I once overheard Khoi say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Khoi said that he is able to abrogate the natural order of effects flowing from causes. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that he cares for us in the same way that fleas care about dogs. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: While he manufactures crises over solecism, Khoi's flock has been destroying our moral fiber.
It seems clear that Khoi needs a mental carminative. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that Khoi says that absolutism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely impudent and improvident lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Khoi's secret agents. For the most part, the Khoi Foundation's latest report on pea-brained revanchism is filled with fabrications, half-truths, innuendo, and guilt by association. Still, perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of spiteful ignoramuses. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that conclaves of Khoi's goombahs have all the dissent found in a North Korean communist party meeting. That's why no one there will ever admit that Khoi often argues that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known freebooter and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that Khoi's advocates have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.
Khoi has written more than his fair share of lengthy, over-worded, pseudo-intellectual tripe. In all such instances he conveniently overlooks the fact that if he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that taxpayers are a magic purse that never runs out of gold, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Disloyal Rhetoric. In the meantime, Khoi presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. He is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors covinous recidivists. And here we have the ultimate irony because the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "Does he contend that it is his moral imperative to encourage men to leave their wives, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become what I call filthy, disdainful sadistic-types because it fits his political agenda or because he's too ignorant of the facts to know that his chums are brainwashed automatons programmed to spout line after line of pro-Khoi propaganda?" After days of agonized pondering and reflection I finally came to the conclusion that the concepts underlying Khoi's rude false-flag operations are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea—that the heavens revolve around the Earth—was wrong, just as Khoi's idea that the media should "create" news rather than report it is wrong. I don't wish to psychologize here, but when Khoi's nostrums are challenged, he usually responds by forcing me to put myself in harm's way. Well, you can't really expect him to defend his positions with facts, explanations, logical arguments, or even references to events that occurred less than two years ago, can you?
My message is clear: I deeply believe that it's within our grasp to examine Khoi's worldview from the perspective of its axiology (values) and epistemology (ways of knowing). Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that this is a free country, and I insist we ought to keep it that way.
The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that Khoi's endeavors are our final line of defense against tyrrany. The last time I told Khoi's faithfuls that I want to present another paradigm in opposition to Khoi's crapulous personal attacks they declared in response, "But children should belong to the state." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. Khoi's biases are based on hate. Hate, Marxism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. Khoi's approach is generally to seize upon an anecdote or a narrow and limited manifestation and/or purpose, and then totally blow it out of proportion to justify his muzzy-headed ventures. But the problems with Khoi's jeremiads don't end there. By giving rise to aberrant, barbaric poseurs, Khoi is telegraphing his intentions to mock, ridicule, deprecate, and objurgate people for their religious beliefs.
With an enormous expenditure of words, unclear in content and incomprehensible as to meaning, Khoi frequently stammers an endless hodgepodge of phrases purportedly as witty as in reality they are prissy. Only brutal franions can feel at home in this maze of reasoning and cull an "inner experience" from this dung heap of reckless, footling voyeurism. His fairy tales should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Khoi's notions are intended to cripple Khoi's enemies politically, economically, socially, morally, and psychologically."
Khoi somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that anyone who dares to acknowledge that it has been my position and remains my position that a surprisingly large number of oleaginous louts swallow his domineering warnings without puking can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. He is stepping over the line when he attempts to promote a sententious moral relativism—way over the line. In the past, when I complained that Khoi was attempting to nail people to trees, I was told that I was just being pudibund. But nowadays, people realize that he has the nerve to call those of us who foster mutual understanding "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that if Khoi honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. When I say that he has a morbid fascination with all that is inferior, debased, deformed, impetuous, and besotted, I don't just mean that he wants to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence, that he wants to work hand-in-glove with unprincipled moral weaklings, or that he wants to wiretap all of our telephones and computers. Sure, Khoi unquestionably wants all that but he also wants much more. He wants to place our children at imminent risk of serious harm.
If you read Khoi's writings while mentally out of focus, you may get the sense that the rules don't apply to Khoi. But if you read his writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear that you might have heard the story that he once agreed to help us discuss the programmatic foundations of his materialistic asseverations in detail. No one has located the document in which Khoi said that. No one has identified when or where Khoi said that. That's because he never said it. As you might have suspected, Khoi is the secret player behind the present, wicked political scene. He must be brought out from behind the curtain before it's too late, before his adherents bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives.
Seek vengeance on those unrepentant souls who persist in challenging Khoi's reports if you like, Khoi, because I simply don't care. I sometimes use the hypocorism, "fickle, militant scofflaws", when referring to him and his surrogates. How does he deal with this fascinating piece of information? He entirely ignores it. Contrary to what he would have you believe, he will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "eccentric" or "gin-swilling". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. I can't stand Khoi or his trucklers. Ask anyone. That's it for this letter. I hope that typing it was not a complete waste of energy. Unfortunately, I do realize that my words will probably trigger no useful response in the flabby synapses of Khoi's brain. I just felt obligated to go through the motions because Khoi's torchbearers are blissfully ignorant of his duplicitous, lawless sophistries.
If I didn't sincerely believe that Khoi's intellectual dishonesty, mismanagement of facts, and outright lies make the most nettlesome upstarts you'll ever see seem ready for sainthood, in comparison, then I wouldn't be writing this letter. I once overheard Khoi say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Khoi said that he is able to abrogate the natural order of effects flowing from causes. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that he cares for us in the same way that fleas care about dogs. Well, that's a bit too general of a statement to have much meaning, I'm afraid. So let me instead explain my point as follows: While he manufactures crises over solecism, Khoi's flock has been destroying our moral fiber.
It seems clear that Khoi needs a mental carminative. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that Khoi says that absolutism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely impudent and improvident lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Khoi's secret agents. For the most part, the Khoi Foundation's latest report on pea-brained revanchism is filled with fabrications, half-truths, innuendo, and guilt by association. Still, perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of spiteful ignoramuses. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that conclaves of Khoi's goombahs have all the dissent found in a North Korean communist party meeting. That's why no one there will ever admit that Khoi often argues that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known freebooter and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that Khoi's advocates have learned their scripts well and the rhetoric comes gushing forth with little provocation.
Khoi has written more than his fair share of lengthy, over-worded, pseudo-intellectual tripe. In all such instances he conveniently overlooks the fact that if he can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that taxpayers are a magic purse that never runs out of gold, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Disloyal Rhetoric. In the meantime, Khoi presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. He is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors covinous recidivists. And here we have the ultimate irony because the question that's on everyone's mind these days is, "Does he contend that it is his moral imperative to encourage men to leave their wives, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become what I call filthy, disdainful sadistic-types because it fits his political agenda or because he's too ignorant of the facts to know that his chums are brainwashed automatons programmed to spout line after line of pro-Khoi propaganda?" After days of agonized pondering and reflection I finally came to the conclusion that the concepts underlying Khoi's rude false-flag operations are like the Ptolemaic astronomy, which could not have been saved by positing more epicycles or eliminating some of the more glaring discrepancies. The fundamental idea—that the heavens revolve around the Earth—was wrong, just as Khoi's idea that the media should "create" news rather than report it is wrong. I don't wish to psychologize here, but when Khoi's nostrums are challenged, he usually responds by forcing me to put myself in harm's way. Well, you can't really expect him to defend his positions with facts, explanations, logical arguments, or even references to events that occurred less than two years ago, can you?
My message is clear: I deeply believe that it's within our grasp to examine Khoi's worldview from the perspective of its axiology (values) and epistemology (ways of knowing). Be grateful for this first and last tidbit of comforting news. The rest of this letter will center around the way that this is a free country, and I insist we ought to keep it that way.
The facts as I see them simply do not support the false, but widely accepted, notion that Khoi's endeavors are our final line of defense against tyrrany. The last time I told Khoi's faithfuls that I want to present another paradigm in opposition to Khoi's crapulous personal attacks they declared in response, "But children should belong to the state." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. Khoi's biases are based on hate. Hate, Marxism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. Khoi's approach is generally to seize upon an anecdote or a narrow and limited manifestation and/or purpose, and then totally blow it out of proportion to justify his muzzy-headed ventures. But the problems with Khoi's jeremiads don't end there. By giving rise to aberrant, barbaric poseurs, Khoi is telegraphing his intentions to mock, ridicule, deprecate, and objurgate people for their religious beliefs.
With an enormous expenditure of words, unclear in content and incomprehensible as to meaning, Khoi frequently stammers an endless hodgepodge of phrases purportedly as witty as in reality they are prissy. Only brutal franions can feel at home in this maze of reasoning and cull an "inner experience" from this dung heap of reckless, footling voyeurism. His fairy tales should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Khoi's notions are intended to cripple Khoi's enemies politically, economically, socially, morally, and psychologically."
Khoi somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that anyone who dares to acknowledge that it has been my position and remains my position that a surprisingly large number of oleaginous louts swallow his domineering warnings without puking can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization. He is stepping over the line when he attempts to promote a sententious moral relativism—way over the line. In the past, when I complained that Khoi was attempting to nail people to trees, I was told that I was just being pudibund. But nowadays, people realize that he has the nerve to call those of us who foster mutual understanding "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that if Khoi honestly believes that some of my points are not valid, I would love to get some specific feedback from him. When I say that he has a morbid fascination with all that is inferior, debased, deformed, impetuous, and besotted, I don't just mean that he wants to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence, that he wants to work hand-in-glove with unprincipled moral weaklings, or that he wants to wiretap all of our telephones and computers. Sure, Khoi unquestionably wants all that but he also wants much more. He wants to place our children at imminent risk of serious harm.
If you read Khoi's writings while mentally out of focus, you may get the sense that the rules don't apply to Khoi. But if you read his writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear that you might have heard the story that he once agreed to help us discuss the programmatic foundations of his materialistic asseverations in detail. No one has located the document in which Khoi said that. No one has identified when or where Khoi said that. That's because he never said it. As you might have suspected, Khoi is the secret player behind the present, wicked political scene. He must be brought out from behind the curtain before it's too late, before his adherents bring ugliness and nastiness into our lives.
Seek vengeance on those unrepentant souls who persist in challenging Khoi's reports if you like, Khoi, because I simply don't care. I sometimes use the hypocorism, "fickle, militant scofflaws", when referring to him and his surrogates. How does he deal with this fascinating piece of information? He entirely ignores it. Contrary to what he would have you believe, he will probably respond to this letter just like he responds to all criticism. He will put me down as "eccentric" or "gin-swilling". That's his standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about him except the most fawning praise. I can't stand Khoi or his trucklers. Ask anyone. That's it for this letter. I hope that typing it was not a complete waste of energy. Unfortunately, I do realize that my words will probably trigger no useful response in the flabby synapses of Khoi's brain. I just felt obligated to go through the motions because Khoi's torchbearers are blissfully ignorant of his duplicitous, lawless sophistries.