2010-01-10, 11:32 PM
Hm, I have a quick question about these rings in regards to Archers.
Is the cruel ring or critical ring better? Would I be right in assuming that the critical ring is better due to having an additional 5% crit bonus over the cruel ring, despite having 10% less crit damage and 1 less WA?
The answer is really the difference between continuing with my Hunter and starting a Crossbowman soon, and restarting my Hunter and making my Crossbowman when the rings get to GMS.
(Now, some of you are probably wondering why I'd bother making a Crossbowman despite how lolweak they may be. It's because...
1: By the time these rings get to GMS, we'll likely know what the next Legend is like, assuming the next Legend really is Archer-based
2: I enjoy playing Archers, damn it. Heck, I played a Hunter before 4th job existed and loved every minute of it. In Scania, no less, which was - and probably still is, but I really don't want to check - land of the Sins and Hermits.)
Is the cruel ring or critical ring better? Would I be right in assuming that the critical ring is better due to having an additional 5% crit bonus over the cruel ring, despite having 10% less crit damage and 1 less WA?
The answer is really the difference between continuing with my Hunter and starting a Crossbowman soon, and restarting my Hunter and making my Crossbowman when the rings get to GMS.
(Now, some of you are probably wondering why I'd bother making a Crossbowman despite how lolweak they may be. It's because...
1: By the time these rings get to GMS, we'll likely know what the next Legend is like, assuming the next Legend really is Archer-based
2: I enjoy playing Archers, damn it. Heck, I played a Hunter before 4th job existed and loved every minute of it. In Scania, no less, which was - and probably still is, but I really don't want to check - land of the Sins and Hermits.)