Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Regarding bans
#50
BombsAway Wrote:You claimed to have enabled the private messaging system for banned users, but it doesn't work. If you click private messages it just reloads the infraction page.

As far as everything else goes, I don't really care. I think you're sending the wrong message by saying "go ahead and create another account, you can get away with anything if you're a valued member." I understand this for a permanent ban (re: greg coming back as grog) but if it's a 10 day ban it should be unacceptable. Serve your ban or appeal; if your appeal fails then serve your ban. The people who are accumulating points aren't bad for the site and therefore should never be put on the BoS list, they're just being themselves. But you're almost baiting them into getting BoS/IP'd with this system by encouraging them to immediately come back after a temp ban.

I just served 10 days, I know it's really difficult. 10 days is kind of excessive for someone who's just accumulated points, especially since points last THREE MONTHS. Which, in thinking about it, is also excessive. No one is going to be an angel for three months when they've got 5 - 6 points, and those of us with a penchant for speaking our minds are getting screwed for a quarter of the year, and that's unfair. It's a forum, for god's sake.

And on that note, the whole infraction system is kind of bull. I shouldn't have been banned for what I said. I flamed, I should have been infracted, but what I said was in no way deserving of a ban. I had two points left, I should have been able to slip by with a 1-point infraction for flaming. I could see a two pointer if I was continuously harassing Bomber, but it was an isolated incidence. Rules shouldn't be set in stone, that's a really gross and abusive way to run a community. Everything should be based on circumstances, rules should be a guideline; a reference, not a sentence. Everyone who's a little mean shouldn't immediately be condemned to a ban in their future with certainty. People who push it continuously should, but I was walking on damn eggshells for a month. I had two points left and nothing I said in that post was worth losing both of them.

This is a nice start on a system that needs to be completely rewritten but it's still not good enough, especially if you want a real growing community. People shouldn't live in fear of a heavy-handed moderator giving them ridiculous infractions because it's "the rules." Everything is circumstantial and should be treated as such. I did a lot of reflecting in the last 10 days and I've always known I'm not a great member or role-model by any means, and I'm not passing the blame for the things I've done wrong. But at the same time, the southperry administration is far from perfect so I don't know what you expect from us.

I've got a lot more to say but right now I'm just really flustered. I'm always going to be willing to work with you to make southperry a better place though, and you're always going to need my input. Not just mine, everyone's. I think that gets overlooked a lot.

Ehhh, I got infracted too. I say I deserved it in a sense. But we all share our times.
Just be thankful we don't get perma banned for 7 infactions.
-4 points here, don't be so harsh about it.-
Edit: After reading my ign twice, I already feel dumb.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Regarding bans - by Fiel - 2010-01-02, 01:18 AM
Regarding bans - by Eos - 2010-01-02, 03:52 AM
Regarding bans - by Turtally - 2010-01-02, 04:05 AM
Regarding bans - by Eos - 2010-01-02, 04:09 AM
Regarding bans - by Grag - 2010-01-02, 12:40 PM
Regarding bans - by Dual - 2010-01-02, 12:49 PM
Regarding bans - by Grag - 2010-01-02, 12:51 PM
Regarding bans - by Eos - 2010-01-02, 12:58 PM
Regarding bans - by Grag - 2010-01-02, 01:05 PM
Regarding bans - by Eos - 2010-01-02, 01:12 PM
Regarding bans - by Katie ♥ - 2010-01-02, 01:15 PM
Regarding bans - by Eos - 2010-01-02, 01:20 PM
Regarding bans - by Katie ♥ - 2010-01-02, 01:21 PM
Regarding bans - by Grag - 2010-01-02, 01:23 PM
Regarding bans - by Fiel - 2010-01-02, 01:29 PM
Regarding bans - by Kawasari Mimoto22 - 2010-01-02, 01:31 PM
Regarding bans - by Fiel - 2010-01-02, 01:33 PM
Regarding bans - by Sarah - 2010-01-02, 03:42 PM
Regarding bans - by Kawasari Mimoto22 - 2010-01-02, 03:56 PM
Regarding bans - by Russt - 2010-01-02, 04:03 PM
Regarding bans - by Sarah - 2010-01-02, 04:16 PM
Regarding bans - by Chompy - 2010-01-02, 04:41 PM
Regarding bans - by Rob - 2010-01-02, 04:47 PM
Regarding bans - by Kawasari Mimoto22 - 2010-01-02, 04:51 PM
Regarding bans - by Fiel - 2010-01-02, 04:59 PM
Regarding bans - by Chompy - 2010-01-02, 05:00 PM
Regarding bans - by Cactuar - 2010-01-02, 05:00 PM
Regarding bans - by Rob - 2010-01-02, 05:03 PM
Regarding bans - by Chompy - 2010-01-02, 05:10 PM
Regarding bans - by Fiel - 2010-01-02, 05:11 PM
Regarding bans - by Kawasari Mimoto22 - 2010-01-02, 05:15 PM
Regarding bans - by Cactuar - 2010-01-02, 05:17 PM
Regarding bans - by Rob - 2010-01-02, 05:21 PM
Regarding bans - by Chompy - 2010-01-02, 05:23 PM
Regarding bans - by Fiel - 2010-01-02, 05:25 PM
Regarding bans - by Chompy - 2010-01-02, 05:26 PM
Regarding bans - by Milelke - 2010-01-02, 07:05 PM
Regarding bans - by Heidi - 2010-01-02, 07:09 PM
Regarding bans - by Eos - 2010-01-02, 07:25 PM
Regarding bans - by Sarah - 2010-01-02, 08:47 PM
Regarding bans - by Russt - 2010-01-02, 08:59 PM
Regarding bans - by Eos - 2010-01-02, 09:10 PM
Regarding bans - by IsaacGS - 2010-01-02, 09:24 PM
Regarding bans - by Sarah - 2010-01-02, 09:24 PM
Regarding bans - by Eos - 2010-01-02, 09:34 PM
Regarding bans - by Fiel - 2010-01-03, 04:27 AM
Regarding bans - by Sarah - 2010-01-03, 01:48 PM
Regarding bans - by Kalovale - 2010-01-04, 02:34 AM
Regarding bans - by Blaine - 2010-01-06, 09:56 PM
Regarding bans - by Bomber - 2010-01-07, 10:11 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)