As well demonstrated on page 1, you can get your points across without kicking up dust here and there just fine. I think it's not about whether or not to address your opinions if they prove to be offensive, but the way you address them. While it is a matter of individual personalities to decide how rigorous/reserved one tends to be, not breaching the borderlines of "attacking other users" doesn't in anyway limit you from what you can potentially say, or what you will eventually say.
"You're an idiot.." and "I don't think that is very wise of you.." convey the same message, one nets you possible satisfaction plus an additional infraction point, the other does neither, and not everyone takes pleasure from attacking other people. I see more harm than good in being overly critical. You have time to think, think.
If you don't think the latter statement does justice to your intention behind the post, you're most likely trying to attack and spite the person just because, and that attitude alone deserves an infraction.
"You're an idiot.." and "I don't think that is very wise of you.." convey the same message, one nets you possible satisfaction plus an additional infraction point, the other does neither, and not everyone takes pleasure from attacking other people. I see more harm than good in being overly critical. You have time to think, think.
If you don't think the latter statement does justice to your intention behind the post, you're most likely trying to attack and spite the person just because, and that attitude alone deserves an infraction.